|
|
|
ObamaCare
-
The US Health Freedom Movement is
Responsible for the Best Changes - But There is
Still Much Work to be Done...
Opinion by Consumer Advocate
Tim
Bolen
Friday,
October 31st, 2010
It is common
knowledge that few, if any, Americans
believe what US network TV tells them
about health care. Most people
don't believe what the big newspapers
tell them either. Americans think
that our media is controlled - and it
is. So, Americans, even those
involved in conventional, status quo,
health care seek real information
elsewhere. And, where do they go?
The answer to that question is readily
obvious. They get information
about what is really happening from
those of us in the North American Health
Freedom Movement; websites, newsletters,
radio shows, TV shows, conferences,
public speaking engagements, legislative
efforts, etc.
In fact, just about everything
we do works. We are being listened to by the
people that matter. I'll give you a
demonstration further down the page.
Why do I say that?
A few day ago an acquaintance
of mine sent me a video, which I'll show you in a
minute, of a speech delivered in a Senate candidate
race in Michigan. The doctor delivering the
speech was using his argument to attempt to get rid
of US Senator John Dingle (D) Michigan in favor of a
Republican candidate. His argument was
that "ObamaCare" needed to be repealed and he was
talking about why he thought that.
My friend wanted me to comment
on the video, so I did. When I did that I
realized something terribly important; that what
this doctor was so angry about was that within "ObamaCare"
the legislators had put provisions in place to deal
with some of the VERY MAJOR US health care ISSUES
that those of us in the Health Freedom Movement had
been complaining about for years. For real.
More, not only had we, in the
Movement been saying these things, but key people in
conventional health care had picked up a large
important part of our message and adopted it as
their own.
Just below I am going to quote
George D. Lundberg MD, the
former Editor in
Chief of Medscape, eMedicine, and the Journal of the
American Medical Association. George, who I am
eager to meet, wrote an interesting blog article in
August of 2009 called
"How to Rein In Medical Costs Right Now."
He was just as brutal in his condemnation of the
system as I am - but the difference is that George
is "in" the system. I'm not. George is
high up in the system and he is listened to - as in
the Obama Administration, and the US Congress,
adopted his ideas (our ideas) so much so that this
Michigan doctor wants to get rid of John Dingle and
repeal Obamacare.
Here is what former JAMA Editor George Lundberg MD
said needed to be done:
-
Intensive
medical therapy (like chelation?) should be substituted for
coronary artery bypass grafting (currently
around 500,000 procedures annually) for many
patients with established coronary artery
disease, saving many billions of dollars
annually.
-
The same for
invasive angioplasty and stenting (currently
around 1,000,000 procedures per year) saving
tens of billions of dollars annually.
-
Most
non-indicated PSA screening for prostate cancer
should be stopped. Radical surgery as the usual
treatment for most prostate cancers should cease
since it causes more harm than good. Billions
saved here. (Just like Hulda Clark said).
-
Screening
mammography in women under 50 who have no
clinical indication should be stopped and for
those over 50 sharply curtailed, since it now
seems to lead to at least as much harm as good.
More billions saved. (Just like Hulda
Clark said).
-
CAT scans and
MRIs are impressive art forms and can be useful
clinically. However, their use is unnecessary
much of the time to guide correct therapeutic
decisions. Such expensive diagnostic tests
should not be paid for on a case by case basis
but grouped along with other diagnostic tests,
by some capitated or packaged method that is
use-neutral. More billions saved.
-
We must stop
paying huge sums to clinical oncologists and
their institutions for administering
chemotherapeutic false hope, along with real
suffering from adverse effects, to patients with
widespread metastatic cancer. More billions
saved. (Just like Hulda Clark said).
-
Death, which
comes to us all, should be as dignified and free
from pain and suffering as possible. We should
stop paying physicians and institutions to
prolong dying with false hope, bravado, and
intensive therapy which only adds to their
profit margin. Such behavior is almost
unthinkable and yet is commonplace. More
billions saved."
Does all that sound
familiar? You bet it does.
Now go listen to this Michigan
doctor whine about it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8HnkxIh62dQ
My response to my Michigan
acquaintance was:
"What this
guy is saying is fairly true but he is not
putting his comments into the right frame of
reference. In the first part he is actually
talking about a hospital's three major profit
centers, all of which are, frankly, a rip-off -
(1) "the end of life treatment protocol," where
when they know the end is near and they trot out
the costly tests, and "new protocols" that do
virtually nothing, but use up the remainder of
the patient's lifetime insurance allotment, and
get nothing for it. And, (2) where a hospital
will order test after test, on an everyday
patient, to run up the bill, and call in every
specialist on staff they can think of. (3) The
use of Chemotherapy for cancer is an expensive
not-funny joke. Chemo works in less than 2% of
cancers. Watch Michael Douglas die - the media
is following it. Then look at Suzanne Somers.
Chemo is horribly expensive - but immensely
profitable. Decisions on treatment, in
hospitals, are made, not by what's best for the
patient, but on the basis of what will make the
hospital, and the doctor the most money. And,
it is not just being done over cancer.
Treatment for heart disease, stroke, and
diabetes, is just as bad.
This
second thing happened to me
recently, when I went to the
Emergency Room with a blood pressure
reading of 217. They kept me for
two days, tested and tested, found
nothing I didn't already know and
referred me to a specialist outside
the hospital. After I got out I
called a very smart Doctor in
Indiana who said to me "how much
magnesium are you taking every day?
How much fish oil? How much Vitamin
C? I wasn't taking any - so he put
me on a high dose, and five days
later I woke up with a blood
pressure reading of 118 - and it
stays there. So, with a little
common sense, and for about eight
bucks a month...
About
30% of all health care costs are spent on "end
of life..." What they are talking about is
forcing the hospitals to NOT offer expensive,
high profit, stuff that might(?) extend life for
another week (in a coma). Yes, they would
calculate the cost benefit.
And, yes, there is a plan to fine doctors and
hospitals - and I agree with it. Remember, that
most patients have a co-pay, and if a hospital
talks a patient's family into ordering end
treatments of little value, the patient's family
better have their assets in a trust, because the
hospital collection department will come after a
widow's home within weeks after a death.
I am surprised that I would agree with the
Editor of the Journal of the American Medical
Association (JAMA) on this issue - but I do.
I had two good articles from a Guest
Editor (John Rappaport) I just emailed out to my
newsletter Subscribers. Go to the front page of
the
www.BolenReport.com website and find the
"The
Starfield Revelation, Revisited...."
Read that - and you will get the feeling that a
whole lot is wrong with our health system that
is NOT being dealt with.
Then, for another piece of the health
care dilemma, go over to the far left
article column, on the
www.BolenReport.com website, and
scroll down to the second article down
called
"Why the
Doctor's Data v Barrett case is
important to North America..."
Read it.
There is no question that US health care needs
reform.
That doctor said that we will lose MDs. Well,
guess what? In the year 2000 we had 770,000
practicing MDs in the US. By the end of 2005 we
were down to 520,000. Where'd they go? Answer
- they left the EXISTING system.
Two more things - there are 750,000 Autistic
children which will take full lifetime care -
and when their parents die who will take care of
them? Of course vaccines are responsible.
Those "silver fillings" in your mouth are 54%
mercury - which leeches out, over the years, and
inhibits your immune system.
Reform of our health care system needs a LOT of
reform. We have just started."
There is no question that the
world is paying attention to our Movement.
Stay tuned.
Tim Bolen - Consumer
Advocate
|
|