US Federal Trade
Commission Drills North Carolina Dental Board...
Opinion by Consumer Advocate
Tim
Bolen
Monday,
June 21st, 2010
The North
Carolina Dental board is in BIG TROUBLE...
On Thursday
June 17th, 2010 The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed
formal charges against the North Carolina Dental Board,
saying:
"Dentists in North Carolina, acting through the
instrument of the North Carolina Board of Dental
Examiners (“Dental Board”), are colluding to exclude
non-dentists from competing with dentists in the
provision of teeth whitening services. The actions of
the Dental Board prevent and deter non-dentists from
providing or expanding teeth whitening services,
increase prices and reduce consumer choice without any
legitimate justification or defense, including the
“state action” defense. The actions of the Dental Board
unreasonably restrain competition and violate Section 5
of the Federal Trade Commission Act."
Section 5 of
the Federal Trade Commission Act says, in part:
"Whenever the Commission shall have reason to believe
that any such person, partnership, or corporation has
been or is using any unfair method of competition or
unfair or deceptive act or practice in or affecting
commerce, and if it shall appear to the Commission that
a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be to the
interest of the public, it shall issue and serve upon
such person, partnership, or corporation a complaint
stating its charges in that respect and containing a
notice of a hearing upon a day and at a place therein
fixed at least thirty days after the service of said
complaint.
The person, partnership, or corporation so complained of
shall have the right to appear at the place and time so
fixed and show cause why an order should not be entered
by the Commission requiring such person, partnership, or
corporation to cease and desist from the violation of
the law so charged in said complaint.
Any person, partnership, or corporation may make
application, and upon good cause shown may be allowed by
the Commission to intervene and appear in said
proceeding by counsel or in person.
The testimony in any such proceeding shall be reduced to
writing and filed in the office of the Commission.
If upon such hearing the Commission shall be of the
opinion that the method of competition or the act or
practice in question is prohibited by this subchapter,
it shall make a report in writing in which it shall
state its findings as to the facts and shall issue and
cause to be served on such person, partnership, or
corporation an order requiring such person, partnership,
or corporation to cease and desist from using such
method of competition or such act or practice."
To read the
entire act, click
here.
The North Carolina Dental Board, and each of its
Members, is in BIG TROUBLE...
Why?
Here is what the FTC sees:
"The Dental Board consists of six licensed dentists, one
licensed hygienist, and one
“consumer member,” who is neither a dentist nor a
hygienist. Each dentist member is
elected to this position by the licensed dentists of
North Carolina, and serves a three-year
term. Collectively, the six dentist members can and do
control the operation of the
Dental Board. Each dentist member is financially
interested in decisions reached by the Dental Board
because, while serving on the Dental Board, each dentist
member continues to engage in the for-profit business of
providing dental services."
More, the FTC
points out:
"THE DENTAL BOARD IS ACTING TO SUPPRESS COMPETITION.
15. The North Carolina dental statute does not expressly
address whether, or under what
circumstances, a non-dentist may engage in teeth
whitening.
16. The Dental Board has decided that the provision of
teeth whitening services by nondentists constitutes UPD.
As detailed herein, the Dental Board has acted in
various ways to eliminate the provision of teeth
whitening services by non-dentists.
17. The Dental Board interprets the North Carolina
dental statute as permitting non-dentists to engage in
the retail sale of teeth whitening products for use at
home. However, the Dental Board has determined that any
service provided along with a teeth whitening product,
including advice, guidance, providing a customer with a
personal tray, whitening solution, mouth piece and/or
LED light, or providing a location to use the
whitening product, constitutes the practice of
dentistry.
18. The Dental Board has engaged in several types of
activities aimed at preventing nondentists from
providing teeth whitening services in North Carolina.
19. In particular, the Dental Board has engaged in
extra-judicial activities aimed at
preventing non-dentists from providing teeth whitening
services in North Carolina.
These activities are not authorized by statute and
circumvent any review or oversight by
the State.
20. On 42 occasions, the Dental Board transmitted
letters to non-dentist teeth whitening
providers, communicating to the recipients that they
were illegally practicing dentistry
without a license and ordering the recipients to cease
and desist from providing teeth
whitening services.
21. On at least six occasions, agents of the Dental
Board also threatened and discouraged non-dentists who
were considering opening teeth whitening businesses by
communicating to them that teeth whitening services
could be provided only under the
direct supervision of a dentist.
22. Furthermore, the Dental Board issued at least 11
letters to third parties, including mall owners and
property management companies, with interests in
approximately 27 malls, stating that teeth whitening
services offered at mall kiosks are illegal. The purpose
of these letters was to block the expansion of teeth
whitening kiosks in shopping malls.
23. The Dental Board’s exclusion of the provision of
teeth whitening services by non-dentists does not
qualify for a state action defense nor is it reasonably
related to any efficiencies or other benefits sufficient
to justify its harmful effect on competition."
It gets even
better. For, the FTC also says:
"ANTICOMPETITIVE EFFECTS OF THE DENTAL BOARD’S ACTIONS
24. The exclusionary course of conduct of the Dental
Board as alleged in Paragraphs 18-22 of the Complaint
may be expected to continue in the absence of effective
relief. As a
consequence of the challenged actions and course of
conduct of the Dental Board, the
availability of non-dentist teeth whitening services in
North Carolina has been and will
be significantly diminished. Numerous businesses have
closed down entirely or have
ceased to sell teeth whitening products and/or services.
Additional teeth whitening
businesses have curtailed their advertising or are
unable to provide the types of services
desired by customers. Several malls in North Carolina
have declined to permit the
operation therein of non-dentist teeth whitening
businesses.
25. The challenged actions and course of conduct of the
Dental Board have had and will have the effect of
restraining competition unreasonably and injuring
consumers in the
following ways, among others:
a. preventing and deterring non-dentists from providing
teeth whitening services in North Carolina;
b. depriving consumers of the benefits of price
competition; and
c. reducing consumer choice in North Carolina for the
provision of teeth whitening
services."
You
are really going to love this part...
"VIOLATIONS ALLEGED
26. The combination, conspiracy, acts and practices
described above, constitute
anticompetitive and unfair methods of competition in or
affecting commerce in violation
of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as
amended, 15 U.S.C. § 45. Such
combination, conspiracy, acts and practices, or the
effects thereof, are continuing and
will continue or recur in the absence of appropriate
relief."
To read the
entire FTC Complaint, click
here.
And, stay tuned...
Tim Bolen - Consumer
Advocate