|
|
|
US
Supreme Court May Fatally Bludgeon Hospitals...
Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen
Friday, December 23rd, 2005
The United States Medical Care system, rated a poor
seventy-second (72nd), worldwide, has been teetering on
the brink of destruction for years now. Greed,
malfeasance, misfeasance, grand corruption, murderous
intent, and a self-centeredness unequaled in history has
led the system to the abyss.
Give
me a hand - let's push it the last few inches over the
edge...
That
same "United States Medical Care system, rated a poor
seventy-second (72nd), worldwide," is rated number
one in another category - IT IS THE NUMBER ONE KILLER OF
AMERICANS. Above heart disease, cancer and stroke, the
medical system, itself, is responsible for the
unnecessary deaths of 783,936 Americans EVERY
YEAR.
If we,
in the "health" movement, have our way, and we
usually do, the United States Supreme Court will be
ruling on a case that will, in effect "open the door"
towards solution of both of the above described
problems.
We know, for instance, that the medical system protects
itself from outside influence and regulation. Locked in
a philosophy of aging, ineffectual, sometimes useless,
but extremely profitable medical paradigms, Americans
have learned to avoid hospitals. And well they should,
for the report
"Death by Medicine," shows that106,000 Americans die
each year in hospitals from adverse drug reactions,
98,000 from medical errors, 88,000 from infections,
37,136 from unnecessary procedures, 32,000 from surgery
related problems, and WORSE YET in those hospitals -
115,000 Americans die from the effects of bedsores,
106,000 from malnutrition (hospital food?), and 199,000
from outpatient adverse drug reactions.
And the hospitals have ways to cover it all up so that
that they not only protect themselves from lawsuits, but
they manage to keep the State regulatory arms at bay.
But we may be about to fix that. That is, if the US
Supreme Court rules our way in the
"Mileikowsky v. Tenet Healthsystem et al,"
case.
“This case
epitomizes why doctors are afraid to report medical
errors and problems,” said Larry
Huntoon, M.D., chairman of the AAPS Committee to Combat
Sham Peer Review.
“To bury their own
mistakes, hospitals label doctors as ‘disruptive’ and
file trumped-up charges of wrongdoing. Then they count
on the ‘where there’s smoke, there’s fire’ perception to
make the doctor the scapegoat.”
"And it’s usually
the most vocal critics and patient advocates who are
thrown on the fire.
“[Dr. Mileikowsky] was an
outspoken member of the staff and was disliked by some
administrators for that reason, as he did not shirk his
responsibility to publicize administrative shortcomings
at the Hospital that undermined patient care,”
states the doctor’s petition to the Supreme Court.
Civil Rights attorney Alan Dershowitz
said in his US Supreme Court Friend of the Court Brief:
“ …Physicians
who are entrusted with the care of their patients can
see their professional careers destroyed if they dare to
challenge a hospital’s practices. When a
‘whistleblowing’ physician is retaliated against, it
threatens not only the physician’s livelihood, but the
care of all patients. This is a case, therefore, that
affects every patient and potential patient in America.”
But,
it gets even better. This case drew the attention, and
the support, not only of the American Association of
Physicians and Surgeons, but
the Union of
American Physicians and Dentists (UAPD), the Semmelweis
Society, the Consumer Attorneys of California (COAC),
and the Government Accountability Project (GAP) - each
of whom joined in the Amicus Brief before the US Supreme
Court.
And, that's not all. In the earlier cases, leading to
the hearing before the US Court, there were Briefs on
Miliekowsky's behalf by the California Medical
Association and the American Medical Association.
Take the time to read some of the material found at
www.aapsonline.org/mileikowsky.)
It reads
like a Ludlum novel - full of twists and turns,
back-stabbing, and underhanded behavior on the part of
hospital representatives. It'll make you think again,
and again, before you trust a loved one to a hospital's
hands.
Of interest too, is the fact that there are other
factors operating to correct the hospital problem. The
California Medical Board, itself, for instance, last
November 3rd, 2005 approved one of the biggest plans in
the history of medicine to dig out hospital problems,
going so far as to get new funding and legislation in
place to go after hospitals. You can read about it by
clicking here.
Everybody, I guess, is tired of the blood, gore,
infection, druggings, inattention to patients, bags of
cash carried out the back doors, and the general
malfeasance of the US hospital system.
Let's see what the US Supreme Court has to say...
Stay tuned...
Tim Bolen - Consumer
Advocate
|
|