Free Speech and Dietary Supplements
Mr. Speaker, I rise to introduce the Health Freedom Protection
Act. This bill restores the First Amendment rights of consumers to
receive truthful information regarding the benefits of foods and
dietary supplements by codifying the First Amendment standards used
by federal courts to strike down the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) efforts to censor truthful health claims. The Health Freedom
Protection Act also stops the Federal Trade Commissions (FTC) from
censoring truthful health care claims.
The American people have made it clear they do not want the
federal government to interfere with their access to dietary
supplements, yet the FDA and the FTC continue to engage in
heavy-handed attempts to restrict such access. The FDA continues to
frustrate consumers’ efforts to learn how they can improve their
health even after Congress, responding to a record number of
constituents’ comments, passed the Dietary Supplement and Health and
Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA). FDA bureaucrats are so determined to
frustrate consumer access to truthful information that they are even
evading their duty to comply with four federal court decisions
vindicating consumers’ First Amendment rights to discover the health
benefits of foods and dietary supplements.
FDA bureaucrats have even refused to abide by the DSHEA section
allowing the public to have access to scientific articles and
publications regarding the role of nutrients in protecting against
diseases by claiming that every article concerning this topic is
evidence of intent to sell a drug.
Because of the FDA’s censorship of truthful health claims,
millions of Americans may suffer with diseases and other health care
problems they may have avoided by using dietary supplements. For
example, the FDA prohibited consumers from learning how folic acid
reduces the risk of neural tube defects for four years after the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended every woman
of childbearing age take folic acid supplements to reduce neural
tube defects. This FDA action contributed to an estimated 10,000
cases of preventable neutral tube defects!
The FDA also continues to prohibit consumers from learning about the
scientific evidence that glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate are
effective in the treatment of osteoarthritis; that omega-3 fatty
acids may reduce the risk of sudden death heart attack; and that
calcium may reduce the risk of bone fractures.
The Health Freedom Protection Act will force the FDA to at last
comply with the commands of Congress, the First Amendment, and the
American people by codifying the First Amendment standards adopted
by the federal courts. Specifically, the Health Freedom Protection
Act stops the FDA from censoring truthful claims about the curative,
mitigative, or preventative effects of dietary supplements, and
adopts the federal court’s suggested use of disclaimers as an
alternative to censorship. The Health Freedom Protection Act also
stops the FDA from prohibiting the distribution of scientific
articles and publications regarding the role of nutrients in
protecting against disease.
This legislation also addresses the FTC’s violations of the First
Amendment. Under traditional First Amendment jurisprudence, the
federal government bears the burden of proving an advertising
statement false before censoring that statement. However, the FTC
has reversed the standard in the case of dietary supplements by
requiring supplement manufactures to satisfy an unobtainable
standard of proof that their statement is true. The FTC’s standards
are blocking innovation in the marketplace.
The Health Freedom Protection Act requires the government bear
the burden of proving that speech could be censored. This is how it
should be in a free, dynamic society. The bill also requires that
the FTC warn parties that their advertising is false and give them a
chance to correct their mistakes.
Mr. Speaker, if we are serious about putting people in charge of
their health care, then shouldn’t we stop federal bureaucrats from
preventing Americans from learning about simple ways to improve
their health. I therefore call on my colleagues to stand up for good
health care and the First Amendment by cosponsoring the Health
Freedom Protection Act.