Barrett
and NCAHF Gasping for Breath Over
Doctor's Data Lawsuit? What's
Next?
Opinion by Consumer Advocate
Tim
Bolen
Friday,
July 16th, 2010
The silence is
telling.
It is now, by my
initial calculations, four days beyond
the deadline for Stephen Barrett to have
filed a Response to the Federal Lawsuit
filed against him by Doctor's Data
laboratory in the Northern District of
Illinois. I just now checked my
Pacer
Account - and no Response has been filed
by anyone, and there is no attorney
listed for any of the Defendants.
Yup, the silence is
telling. And, it feels really
good.
I suspect that Mrs.
Barrett's little boy Stevie is making
good use of his "Caller ID" telephone
feature, not picking up the phone when
he can identify the call as coming from
a Board Member of the NCAHF wanting to
know just how it was that he, Barrett,
used their name without the Board's
permission, and got them sued. I
imagine there was foul language involved
in the recorded message.
In short, I don't see
the quackbuster "First String" jumping
into the fray defending Stevie's
position. I hear dead silence from
them - which does not bode well for
Stevie. I suspect there is
dissidence in the upper ranks and there has
been for a while.
There is, however, a
high activity level from the quackpot
Farm Team. They are all over the
place, whining, whimpering, postulating,
pontificating, pimpering, and
mini-screeching - hoping against hope
that none of this is real and that it
will all go away.
But - and this is
important - do not write off the
quackpot "Farm Team." They may be
dumber than a box, individually, but
someone with Search Engine Optimization
(SEO) knowledge has provided them with a
powerful tool - one that works to their
advantage quite well, and if played
right, back at them, will cause their
demise. They dominate the internet
search engines with their nonsense.
We can use this
situation to shut them down completely.
Forever. Keep reading.
You'll see what I mean.
Doctor's Data's Next Moves...
No matter what
Barrett and the NCAHF do to Respond, or
not Respond, it will take time.
Doctor's Data has some legal tools it
will no doubt use to mitigate the
situation and stop the damage being
done.
The Temporary
Injunction - is a simple tool and
could be put into place easily, whether
or not Barrett and the NCAHF fail to
Respond to the suit. The simplest
injunction would force Barrett, or his
ISP, to remove any and all
references to Doctor's Data from his
websites and newsletters.
However, Barrett and
his street gang, thought of this, I
think, and simply put similar
stories on other blogs and websites,
then tied them all together to give them
search engine (SEO) placement - and they
did this clearly in malicious anticipation of
defying the US Court system, making a
Temporary Injunction useless.
So, there are some
better ways. And, the law provides.
I am suggesting that
Doctor's Data use two important tools
immediately:
(1) The
Psychiatric Examination of Stephen
Barrett. At first, they could
simply get a Board Certified
Psychiatrist to examine Barrett, at a
distance, in the light of his
activities. On the basis oif that
written report they could file a Motion
with the Judge asking for a forced
Psychiatric Examination of Barrett.
Why? What this loony is doing is
simply not normal behavior. Who
sets themselves up as an expert on
everything, tells people he is, and
enforces his delusions? To me,
Barrett is simply a
Public Nuisance.
It is time to deal this goofy in exactly
that way.
(2) The use
of a
"Gang Injunction" strategy to
force all of Barrett's minions to stop
maliciously damaging Doctor's Data and
the patients and health professionals
they serve.
"Gang
injunction is a court-issued
restraining order prohibiting
gang members from participating in
certain activities. It is based on the
legal theory that gang activity
constitutes a
public nuisance that prevents non-gang members from
enjoying peace in their communities."
It's time we had "peace in our
communities..."
Stay tuned.
Tim Bolen - Consumer
Advocate