This article is the sixth in a series about THE MOST IMPORTANT CASE ABOUT AUTISM currently being litigated - the Hooker v. United States Department of health and Humans Services, et al case.

Why is this the most important case? 

Because of what happened in what was called the  "Omnibus Autism Proceedings" (OAP) in 2010.

The special Vaccine Court created by the  National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA), in 1987, had become overloaded with claims about 2007, and the Special Masters running the court simply did not want to have to trudge through the backlog of the 5,400 cases facing it over vaccine injuries. 

There in 2010,  a special Vaccine Court sub-set, called the OAP, decided six test cases - three from the MMR Vaccine causes Autism argument, and three from the Thimerosal (mercury) in vaccines causes Autism argument.  Those cases were themselves, representing a backlog of the 5,400 cases, which, in turn, represented the interests of over 2,000,000 vaccine damaged children in the US.  More, those cases, if won by the Plaintiffs, would have set the stage for relief for the families of the one in six children vaccine damaged showing neurological damage.

The OAP judges relied COMPLETELY, for all six cases, on the truth and validity of the five so-called studies ordered and run by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Now you see the importance...

After reviewing Hooker's research it is easy to come to a conclusion  - EVERY one of the CDC studies showing the so-called safety of mercury in vaccines has been intentionally faked, so as to lead the American Public, and every entity worldwide that relies on the CDC for information, to believe that mercury in vaccines is safe - it is not.

The case was a setup...

Brian Hooker sued the CDC to get copies of their internal memorandums, emails, letters, etc.

But Hooker and his team were playing a trick.  They knew that the same people who would create fake studies would try to cover up their tracks any way they could.  So, they set up a trap - and the CDC walked right into it.

What was the trap?  Hooker had a good many of the documents, already, he was being denied.  More, he knew where more of them were stored, and he had been promised access.  So, they demanded documents, let the CDC reply that (1) there weren't any, (2)  the documents didn't say anything pertinent, (3) blah, blah, blah.

And then they spring the trap with the Judge.  As in "Gee Judge, these bastards are lying."

Why do this?  To set them up for CRIMINAL Indictment.  Period.

So, What's Happening?

I love the US court system sometimes.  Not all the time, of course, but, frankly, quite often. 

Smile now.  Things are heating up in the Hooker v. United States Department of Health AND Human Services, et al federal court case.  The federal judge in the case, has issued the following Order:

What the Judge's Order actually means...

FOIA Section 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(5) authorizes agencies to withhold information related solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of an agency.  The Judge is saying "show me where this rule applies in these communications."

In Camera inspection happens when a judge reviews evidence (depositions, documents, photos and the like) to determine whether it should be provided to other parties. This usually occurs when both sides in a case disagree about whether a certain, usually crucial piece of evidence should come in.

The Court will review non-jury cases de novo to determine if the agency came to a reasonable conclusion.

So, in short, the Judge isn't buying the CDC's arguments about why it is withholding information.  The trap Hooker set paid off.  It looks to me that the federal judge is beginning to smell the rat in the CDC's position.

Where is this going?

The search for documents, in this court case, is uncovering a pattern of criminal activity.  Whoever is running, making the decisions to withhold documents at CDC, knows where all this is going.  I am certain that within the walls of the CDC, right this minute, certain CDC employees - past and present, contractors, and consultants, etc. are quietly being told to personally "lawyer-up," and familiarize themselves on how to make claim to the Fifth Amendment provisions of the US Constitution (taking the Fifth).

Is there really criminal activity here?

You bet there is.  Major criminal activity.  The people involved in this denial of the effects of Thimerosal in vaccines, and the cover up of the real situation, are some of, perhaps, the worst criminals in the history of mankind.  Just look at the numbers of children damaged, and the cost to society - worldwide.  This is far worse than anything the NAZIs, or Stalin, did.  This overshadows any genocide effort in the history of mankind.

This isn't about simple fraud, the marketing of vaccines, or some comparison of preservatives in vaccines.  This is about major damage to children.  And it is all coming out.

And that's the bottom line.