- Federal Judge
Orders CDC to Produce Secret Documents...
The CDC Has Known All Along
How Dangerous Vaccines Are - And Has Covered It
Up... (Part Six)
Opinion by Consumer Advocate
Friday, July 6th, 2012
This article is the sixth in a series
about THE MOST IMPORTANT CASE ABOUT
AUTISM currently being litigated - the
Hooker v. United States Department of
health and Humans Services, et al case.
Why is this the most important case?
Because of what happened in what was
called the "Omnibus
Autism Proceedings" (OAP) in 2010.
The special Vaccine Court created by
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act
(NCVIA), in 1987, had become overloaded
with claims about 2007, and the Special
Masters running the court simply did not
want to have to trudge through the
backlog of the 5,400 cases facing it
over vaccine injuries.
There in 2010, a special Vaccine
Court sub-set, called the OAP, decided
six test cases - three from the MMR
Vaccine causes Autism argument, and
three from the Thimerosal (mercury)
in vaccines causes Autism argument.
Those cases were themselves,
representing a backlog of the 5,400
cases, which, in turn, represented the
interests of over 2,000,000 vaccine
damaged children in the US. More,
those cases, if won by the Plaintiffs,
would have set the stage for relief for
the families of the one in six children
vaccine damaged showing neurological
The OAP judges relied COMPLETELY, for
all six cases, on the truth and validity
of the five so-called studies ordered
and run by the Center for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC).
Now you see the importance...
After reviewing Hooker's research it is
easy to come to a conclusion -
EVERY one of the CDC studies showing the
so-called safety of mercury in vaccines
has been intentionally faked, so as
to lead the American Public, and every
entity worldwide that relies on the CDC
for information, to believe that mercury
in vaccines is safe - it is not.
The case was a
Brian Hooker sued the CDC to get copies
of their internal memorandums, emails,
"In late 2004 Biochemist Scientist Brian Hooker PhD
had had enough. He'd been looking, carefully,
through the US Center for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC)'s so-called "Evidence" that
Thimerosal was "Safe and Effective" as a
preservative in vaccines. Having read all of the
then available CDC studies making that claim, he, as
a PhD Scientist, couldn't help but shake his head
"NO." To him, none of the purported proof was
anywhere near being scientifically adequate. Far
So, like any math teacher would do to a student he
began to communicate to the CDC his questions. In
essence he was saying "Show me your work. Show me
how you came up with these answers" - a reasonable
question series among scientists, teachers and
students, and frankly, the population of Planet
What was CDC's response? STONEWALL - a six year
knock-down, drag-out brawl to get that information.
Brian Hooker would not let up. Neither would the
But Hooker and his team were playing a
trick. They knew that the same
people who would create fake studies
would try to cover up their tracks any
way they could. So, they set up a
trap - and the CDC walked right into it.
What was the trap? Hooker had a
good many of the documents, already, he
was being denied. More, he knew
where more of them were stored, and he
had been promised access. So, they
demanded documents, let the CDC reply
that (1) there weren't any, (2)
the documents didn't say anything
pertinent, (3) blah, blah, blah.
And then they spring the trap with the
Judge. As in "Gee Judge, these
bastards are lying."
Why do this? To set them up for
CRIMINAL Indictment. Period.
I love the US court system sometimes.
Not all the time, of course, but,
frankly, quite often.
Things are heating up in the Hooker v.
United States Department of Health AND
Human Services, et al federal court
case. The federal judge in the
case, has issued the following Order:
"Defendants are directed to deliver
the documents withheld under 5 U.S.C.
§ 552(b)(5) to chambers for an in
camera inspection to assist the
Court in making a responsible de
novo determination. In-Camera
Submission is due by Friday,
Judge's Order actually means...
5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(5)
authorizes agencies to withhold
information related solely to the
internal personnel rules and practices
of an agency. The Judge is saying
"show me where this rule applies in
In Camera inspection happens when a
judge reviews evidence (depositions,
documents, photos and the like) to
determine whether it should be provided
to other parties. This usually occurs
when both sides in a case disagree about
whether a certain, usually crucial piece
of evidence should come in.
The Court will review non-jury cases
de novo to determine if the agency
came to a reasonable conclusion.
So, in short, the Judge isn't buying the
CDC's arguments about why it is
withholding information. The trap
Hooker set paid off. It looks to
me that the federal judge is beginning
to smell the rat in the CDC's position.
Where is this
The search for documents, in this court
case, is uncovering a pattern of
criminal activity. Whoever is
running, making the decisions to
withhold documents at CDC, knows where
all this is going. I am certain
that within the walls of the CDC, right
this minute, certain CDC employees -
past and present, contractors, and
consultants, etc. are quietly being told
to personally "lawyer-up," and
familiarize themselves on how to make
claim to the Fifth Amendment provisions
of the US Constitution (taking the
Is there really
criminal activity here?
You bet there is. Major criminal
activity. The people involved in
this denial of the effects of Thimerosal
in vaccines, and the cover up of the
real situation, are some of, perhaps,
the worst criminals in the history of
mankind. Just look at the numbers
of children damaged, and the cost to
society - worldwide. This is far
worse than anything the NAZIs, or
Stalin, did. This overshadows any
genocide effort in the history of
This isn't about simple fraud, the
marketing of vaccines, or some
comparison of preservatives in vaccines.
This is about major damage to children.
And it is all coming out.
And that's the bottom line.
Tim Bolen - Consumer